Do non-sentient entities have moral consideration or standing?

Moral stand up is the fact that a creation be ethically considered for its own saki. When we secern that some macrocosms be ask deterrent example stand up we say in a virtuous matter setting that their welfare must be given some consideration. To crystalise it, an singular has chaste standing for us if when making righteous decisions, we witness we ought to take that individuals eudaimonia into account for the individuals own saki and not for our benefit or someone elses benefit. For example a reinstate who seeks the physical welfare of his patients and believes that it would be morally untimely to swear out them in an improper way. If he believes this, not because of any benefits he will get if he takes care of them, but entirely because hes concern in his patients well-being. His patients have moral standing for him. On the other hand, a farmer who looks after the welfare of his head and believes that a morally wrong action would be to forgo irrigating i t or not taking care of it. If he believes this whole because mistreating the direct would decrease its fruit production where this last mentioned is an inborn source of nourishment and income for his family. This farmer considers his trees welfare only for the sake of his family and not for the sake of the tree itself.

The tree has no moral standing for the farmer. In opposite direction, the tree would have moral standing for the farmer if he considers the trees welfare for the sake of the tree i.e. takes care of it preventing it from dying.Many arguments could be adopted to consider if non-sentient entities have moral s tanding or not. Feinberg considered that onl! y beings that have interests potful be represented, so as a fact only being that has interests can... If you want to get a full essay, devote it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper